On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, 11:18+0200, Valentin Nechayev wrote: > Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 03:14:33, strick (Dan Strick) wrote about "UFS file system > problem in either stable or current": > > DS> There seems to be an inconsistency between release 4.9-RC and 5.1 ufs > DS> support. If I fsck the same ufs (type 1 of course) file system on > DS> both releases, each claims that the other has left incorrect > DS> summary data in the superblock. Presumably only one can be correct. > DS> I just don't know which to blame. > > Does this require explicit fsck? > I have dual-booting between 4.9-release (and all previous 4.* releases earlier) > and 5.1 (of 20030526) with shared disks and boot checking required in fstab; > sometimes one of them crash and forced checking is made; neither 4.* nor 5.1 > claims superblock is bad.
mckusick's answer: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=100639+0+archive/2003/freebsd-current/20030323.freebsd-current Dan's PR: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/58373 -- Maxim Konovalov, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
