Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 03:14:33, strick (Dan Strick) wrote about "UFS file system problem in either stable or current":
DS> There seems to be an inconsistency between release 4.9-RC and 5.1 ufs DS> support. If I fsck the same ufs (type 1 of course) file system on DS> both releases, each claims that the other has left incorrect DS> summary data in the superblock. Presumably only one can be correct. DS> I just don't know which to blame. Does this require explicit fsck? I have dual-booting between 4.9-release (and all previous 4.* releases earlier) and 5.1 (of 20030526) with shared disks and boot checking required in fstab; sometimes one of them crash and forced checking is made; neither 4.* nor 5.1 claims superblock is bad. -netch- _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
