"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
You'll also notice I'm not questioning the _existence_ of ACL. My point is that FreeBSD is Unix (no matter what the lawyers say), and people don't usually think of ACL when they think of Unix. Ergo, enabling ACL by defautl violates POLA.
Not if you never *set* an ACL on anything. It's only when there are ACL's set on things that POLA may be violated.
Which is fine if there's no one else on the machine... :-)
One presumes that an ACL has to be set on purpose...
By _someone_, at at any rate. :-)
And, in FreeBSD, POLA is king.
(Or so we used to believe, no matter what we actually did. :)
I'd be astonished if that weren't true. 8-) 8-).
-- Terry
--
Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS)
Gerencia de Operacoes
Divisao de Comunicacao de Dados
Coordenacao de Seguranca
VIVO Centro Oeste Norte
Fones: 55-61-313-7654/Cel: 55-61-9618-0904
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Outros:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Hoffer's Discovery:
The grand act of a dying institution is to issue a newly
revised, enlarged edition of the policies and procedures manual._______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
