"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote: > You'll also notice I'm not questioning the _existence_ of ACL. My point > is that FreeBSD is Unix (no matter what the lawyers say), and people > don't usually think of ACL when they think of Unix. Ergo, enabling ACL > by defautl violates POLA.
Not if you never *set* an ACL on anything. It's only when there are ACL's set on things that POLA may be violated. One presumes that an ACL has to be set on purpose... > And, in FreeBSD, POLA is king. > > (Or so we used to believe, no matter what we actually did. :) I'd be astonished if that weren't true. 8-) 8-). -- Terry _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
