In message <p05101511b8bab342dc49@[128.113.24.47]>, Garance A Drosihn writes: >At 8:35 AM -0800 3/17/02, David O'Brien wrote: >>My earlier concerns about the use of Perforce were when a developers >>expected other developers to use Perforce for _shared_ development. >>Or that tried to claim that their code was "published" if it was >>in the Perforce depot on Freefall. > >Exactly my concerns, too.
I have just started two days ago using P4 to track the sparc64 stuff and confidently say that contrary to the ill effects I hear people complain about I have yet to see any signs of hair-loss, lack of sleep, early aging, republicanism or uncontrollable urges to go to Tenerife. I can think of many things wrong with P4 and with having a parallel environment to our CVS tree. But I also think having a P4 tree where people can colaborate beats not having it by a large margin. So could I suggest that the people who are so much against P4 tell us what the alternative they want us to use is ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
