On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 05:57:19PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev scribbled: | Motomichi Matsuzaki wrote: | | > At Wed, 27 Dec 2000 15:38:58 +0200, | > Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > > > But your solution is no effective and much harmful to multibyte users. | > > You are not quite right. For multibyte users my solution (workaround?) is at |least equial to the previous no-unicode case . I do | > > not see how it can be harmful. | > | > 1. In just your workaround, multibyte users will take no merits. | > | > 2. Based on your direction, the size of loadable conversion table | > will immensely expand for multibyte support, or be abandoned. | > Fundamental misdesign will lead to such unfortunate situation. | > So I said your solution was harmful. | | Proposed by me patches is no way an official direction of the Project and as I |advertised are merely a workaround to allow non-English | users to read CD with native filenames until comprehensive iconv for kernel will be |introduced. I would be glad if someone will | replace my hack with more generic solution. I think that making this "hack" a russian/xxxfs port and I think everyone can be happy. If you want unicode FS like this, perhaps you can have a sysutils/unicodefs. :) After all, what are KLD's for but modularity? :) -- +------------------------------------------------------------------+ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | http://peorth.iteration.net/~keichii | Yes, BSD is a conspiracy. | +------------------------------------------------------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
