On 2025-10-15 05:16, Lexi Winter wrote:
Ronald Klop wrote in <324231230.147694.1760527890049@localhost>:
Yesterday I installed a 15-BETA1 jail using pkgbase
FreeBSD-set-minimal-jail.  I was missing FreeBSD-dhclient which is
fine and I installed it. Then it didn't have DNS as FreeBSD-resolvconf
was missing.  I understand that theoretically dhclient can operate
without resolvconf, but in practice they seem pretty useful together.

Should FreeBSD-dhclient depend on FreeBSD-resolvconf?

dhclient should depend on resolvconf and i will fix this.

i am curious how widespread dhclient use in jails is.  should we add
dhclient to set-minimal-jail?

NB, "set-minimal-jail" is not intended to be the smallest possible set
of packages for a jail; it's meant to be "minimal" (the basic base system)
for jails.


so if dhclient use in jails is widespread, we should probably
add it to minimal-jail.
IMHO isn't the HOST responsible for routing? Doesn't that make dhclient
and friends somewhat unusual (not average jail(8) setup?).

--
There is no such place as the internet

Attachment: 0xE512722F.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Reply via email to