On Wed, 15 Oct 2025 12:05:24 -0400 Matteo Riondato <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Oct 15, 2025, at 11:16 AM, Lexi Winter <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Roger Marquis wrote in <[email protected]>: > >> I think most of us would define a minimal jail > > > > again -- i appreciate this is not very clear from the package name -- > > the "minimal-jail" set is not "a minimal jail". it is the "minimal" > > set, i.e. the set of packages required for a basic multi-user UNIX > > system, but without packages which don't work in a jail. > > Would calling it “basic-jail” or “standard-jail” (terms used in previous > emails on this thread) perhaps be more descriptive? > > Thanks, > Matteo I prefer"minimal" here, as term "standard" should be different case-by-case. For admins who want to run each services exposing to Internet to be run on jails "per service", "minimal" is equal to "standard". But, especially corporate admins who needs "per-emproyee" jails for security, almost full sets of base plus common-apps-of-the-corporate ports should be called "standard (of the corporate)". -- Tomoaki AOKI <[email protected]>
