On 19/08/2025 23:49, Colin Percival wrote:
… rename "FreeBSD-kmods" to "FreeBSD-ports-kmods". …
I prefer FreeBSD-kmods.
Not because FreeBSD-ports-kmods is troublesome, per se. Partly because:
- it's only slightly more descriptive
- the longer name is _not_ a hint that the repo is limited to a
_subset_ of non-base kernel modules.
Also partly because users have become accustomed to the distinctive
existing name, and I'm not aware of any user suggesting an alternative.
I think of FreeBSD-kmods as complementing both FreeBSD-base _and_
FreeBSD-ports. If you rename the repo to reflect only the origin of the
packages: that's, like, only part of the picture.
