On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, Mark Murray wrote: > By your own admission, the old system was bad; yet you still want > ${it}? You'd like to see a programmer with less experience than > Schneier come up with a more secure algorithm than him? The old implementation was bad. The class of algorithm is not, as long as you are conservative about your entropy estimates. Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: randomdev entropy gathering is really ... Kris Kennaway
- Re: randomdev entropy gathering is really ... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: randomdev entropy gathering is really ... Kris Kennaway
- Re: randomdev entropy gathering is really ... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: randomdev entropy gathering is really ... Stefan `Sec` Zehl
- Re: randomdev entropy gathering is really ... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: randomdev entropy gathering is really ... Stefan `Sec` Zehl
- Re: randomdev entropy gathering is really ... Mark Murray
- Re: randomdev entropy gathering is really ... Mark Murray
- Re: randomdev entropy gathering is really ... Mark Murray
- Re: randomdev entropy gathering is really ... Kris Kennaway
- Re: randomdev entropy gathering is really ... Mark Murray
- Re: randomdev entropy gathering is really ... Mark Murray
- Re: randomdev entropy gathering is really ... Jeroen C. van Gelderen
- Re: randomdev entropy gathering is really ... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: randomdev entropy gathering is really weak Dan Moschuk
- Re: randomdev entropy gathering is really weak Jeroen C. van Gelderen
- Re: randomdev entropy gathering is really ... Steve Kargl
- Re: randomdev entropy gathering is really ... Mark Murray
- RE: randomdev entropy gathering is really ... David Schwartz
- RE: randomdev entropy gathering is really ... Kris Kennaway