Alexander Leidinger wrote on 03.10.20 17:37: > Quoting Kristof Provost <k...@freebsd.org> (from Sat, 03 Oct 2020 16:06:43 > +0200):
>> Okay, let’s abandon that patch. It’s ugly and it doesn’t work. >> >> Here’s a different approach that I’m much happier with. >> https://people.freebsd.org/~kp/0001-bridge-Call-member-interface-ioctl-without-NET_EPOCH.patch >> >> >> It passes the regression tests with WITNESS and INVARIANTS enabled, >> and a hack in the epair ioctl() handler to make it sleep (to look a >> bit like the Intel ioctl() handler that currently trips up if_bridge). > Works for me. > No crash, no LOR, promisc-mode stays enabled, jails are reachable. indeed! I can second that. Works nicely, my machine does not panic anymore and machines (bhyve vms) behind the bridge are reachable. felix -- GPG/PGP: 7A0B612C / 5F4D 9B06 C240 3250 35BF 66ED 1AD3 A9B8 7A0B 612C https://hazardous.org/ - f...@hazardous.org - fkr@irc - @felixkronlage _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
