On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:21 PM Kristof Provost <k...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On 28 Sep 2020, at 16:44, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > Quoting Kristof Provost <k...@freebsd.org> (from Mon, 28 Sep 2020 > > 13:53:16 +0200): > > > >> On 28 Sep 2020, at 12:45, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > >>> Quoting Kristof Provost <k...@freebsd.org> (from Sun, 27 Sep 2020 > >>> 17:51:32 +0200): > >>>> Here’s an early version of a task queue based approach: > >>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~kp/0001-bridge-Cope-with-if_ioctl-s-that-sleep.patch > >>>> > >>>> That still needs to be cleaned up, but this should resolve the > >>>> sleep issue and the LOR. > >>> > >>> There are some issues... seems like inside a jail I can't ping > >>> systems outside of the hardware.
So similar to the others, kind of. Using the original https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26418 patch, everything seems to work fine. Using the newer http://people.freebsd.org/~kp/0001-bridge-Cope-with-if_ioctl-s-that-sleep.patch patch, byhve VMs on the bridge attached to the igb/em(5) interfaces don't pass traffic. The bhyve VMs on the bridge attached to the cxgbe(4) interfaces, however, work fine. -Dustin _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
