On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 12:36:59AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > Ok (/me dons the asbestos suit, climbs into the concrete room and locks > the door.) Here is my proposal. It attempts to follow these loose guidelines: > compile/ - no change I'd change this into compile/${MACHINE_ARCH} so that a single shared source tree can be used to build [alpha,i386] kernels. In the current setup one gets clashes with GENERIC etc. -- Wilko Bulte http://www.freebsd.org "Do, or do not. There is no try" [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.nlfug.nl Yoda - The Empire Strikes Back To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: /sys hierarchy Will Andrews
- Re: /sys hierarchy David O'Brien
- Re: /sys hierarchy Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: /sys hierarchy Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: /sys hierarchy John Baldwin
- Re: /sys hierarchy Chris Costello
- Re: /sys hierarchy John Baldwin
- Re: /sys hierarchy Louis A. Mamakos
- Re: /sys hierarchy Garrett Wollman
- Re: /sys hierarchy John Baldwin
- Re: /sys hierarchy Wilko Bulte
- Re: /sys hierarchy John Baldwin
- Re: /sys hierarchy Chris Costello
- Re: /sys hierarchy Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: /sys hierarchy Chris Costello
- Re: /sys hierarchy Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: /sys hierarchy Warner Losh
- Re: /sys hierarchy David O'Brien
- Re: /sys hierarchy Warner Losh
- Re: /sys hierarchy Richard Wackerbarth
- Re: /sys hierarchy Doug Barton