It seems Bernd Walter wrote: > On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 09:39:36PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: > > I dont think vinum is/was usable under -current at least not the > > RAID5 stuff, its broken, and some of it is because greg is not > > up to date with what -current looks like these days. > > Can you please explain what have massivly changed in current that relates > to vinum? The changes done by phk to seperate out the io stuff from struct buf. -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Soren Schmidt
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Vallo Kallaste
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Bernd Walter
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Bernd Walter
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Vallo Kallaste
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Bernd Walter
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Soren Schmidt
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Soren Schmidt
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Bernd Walter
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Soren Schmidt
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Greg Lehey
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Matthew Dillon
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Bernd Walter
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Vallo Kallaste
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Soren Schmidt
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Matthew Dillon
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Soren Schmidt
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Greg Lehey
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Greg Lehey