It seems Bernd Walter wrote: > On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 08:02:54PM +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote: > > Yes, but I don't have space for crashdump and I can't build new kernel > > with limited memory usage because I don't have /usr filesystem up and > > running. Is there a way to limit memory usage without recompiling > > kernel? I can store 32MB crashdump at the moment, no separate /var > > filesystem because I thought 4.0-RELEASE will be stable enough for > > experimenting with vinum.. > > I don't have another 4.0-RELEASE or stable system but I'll try to build > > 4.0-R kernel on -current system. > > Just to clearify the things... > Are these problems with 4.0-RELEASE with 4.0-STABLE or with 5.0-CURRENT? I have the problem with 4.0-RELEASE, STABLE and 5.0-current but it might only occur with RAID5... -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Vallo Kallaste
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Vallo Kallaste
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Soren Schmidt
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Bernd Walter
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Soren Schmidt
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Vallo Kallaste
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Bernd Walter
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Bernd Walter
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Vallo Kallaste
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Bernd Walter
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Soren Schmidt
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Soren Schmidt
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Bernd Walter
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Soren Schmidt
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Greg Lehey
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Matthew Dillon
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Bernd Walter
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Vallo Kallaste
- Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Soren Schmidt