Quoting David Schultz <d...@freebsd.org> (from Tue, 26 Apr 2011
11:46:45 -0400):
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010, Rui Paulo wrote:
Hi,
I've been chatting with the ICC ex-users and they seem to be ok
with the removal of the ICC bits from share/mk and other places.
The reason is that it doesn't work and no one has volunteered to
fix it for many years. This seems to indicate that the interest in
ICC is low.
If there's anyone against this, speak now or forever be silent. :-)
For what it's worth, I still occasionally use icc for simple
tasks-- mainly as a reference for code generation, since it
produces reasonable output in many cases where gcc does not.
As I recall, making it work required minimal changes... possibly
just making sure __va_list gets defined in _types.h. I have
the following in one of my trees, although this is obviously
not the right fix.
It depends if you want to hide the problem on all other compilers or
not. I would prefer to not hide the problem.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Volley Theory:
It is better to have lobbed and lost
than never to have lobbed at all.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
