On Wed, Aug 18, 2010, Rui Paulo wrote: > Hi, > I've been chatting with the ICC ex-users and they seem to be ok with the > removal of the ICC bits from share/mk and other places. > The reason is that it doesn't work and no one has volunteered to fix it for > many years. This seems to indicate that the interest in ICC is low. > If there's anyone against this, speak now or forever be silent. :-)
For what it's worth, I still occasionally use icc for simple tasks-- mainly as a reference for code generation, since it produces reasonable output in many cases where gcc does not. As I recall, making it work required minimal changes... possibly just making sure __va_list gets defined in _types.h. I have the following in one of my trees, although this is obviously not the right fix. Index: _types.h =================================================================== --- _types.h (revision 219357) +++ _types.h (working copy) @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ */ #ifdef __GNUCLIKE_BUILTIN_VARARGS typedef __builtin_va_list __va_list; /* internally known to gcc */ -#elif defined(lint) +#else typedef char * __va_list; /* pretend */ #endif #if defined(__GNUC_VA_LIST_COMPATIBILITY) && !defined(__GNUC_VA_LIST) \ _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
