On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:23:32AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:15:26AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > > Brooks Davis <bro...@freebsd.org> writes: > > > http://wiki.freebsd.org/201005ToolchainSummitSummary > > > > "No new functionality that requires clang/llvm." > > > > How about "No new functionality with non-trivial incompatibilities with > > clang/llvm"? > > That too. I'll add it to the real roadmap page once I create it. > > As long as people are willing to avoid the darker areas of gcc > misfeatures that shouldn't be a problem in general, but I agree stating > it as a target is a good idea. >
You might add a first step to fix FreeBSD's libelf incompatibilities with other libelf implementations. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-05/msg00381.html -- Steve _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
