On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:15:26AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > Brooks Davis <bro...@freebsd.org> writes: > > http://wiki.freebsd.org/201005ToolchainSummitSummary > > "No new functionality that requires clang/llvm." > > How about "No new functionality with non-trivial incompatibilities with > clang/llvm"?
That too. I'll add it to the real roadmap page once I create it. As long as people are willing to avoid the darker areas of gcc misfeatures that shouldn't be a problem in general, but I agree stating it as a target is a good idea. -- Brooks
pgp2ib5kyJ4Mh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
