> Doesn't this imply that clang/llvm isn't quite ready for deployment.
> Being able to boot a complete clang/llvm compiled FreeBSD system
> would seem to be critical.

This is why clang would be turned off by default. This import is just
making it easier to test the clangbsd branch. I'm all for this change
(and when it happens I'll start testing clangbsd).

-- 
Eitan Adler
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to