On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 05:07:44PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2010-05-31 16:49, Steve Kargl wrote: > >> So, what exactly should we expect, if anything, to break? :) > > > > Did you build and install new boot code? ISTR that clang > > can't compile src/sys/boot/i386/boot0 to the required > > 512 bytes. > > No, boot0 is written in assembly, and run through the regular (GNU) > assembler. Neither gcc nor clang do anything more except calling the > linker. > > The only component (in the whole clangbsd src tree) which still needs to > be compiled with gcc is boot2, which otherwise ends up just a little too > big, and doesn't fit. This is being worked on, but it isn't very > critical, really. Note that clangbsd automatically uses gcc for this > specific code, unless you override it manually.
Doesn't this imply that clang/llvm isn't quite ready for deployment. Being able to boot a complete clang/llvm compiled FreeBSD system would seem to be critical. When you say "This is being worked on", do you mean clang/llvm is being changed to compile boot2 or do you mean boot2 is being changed to allow clang/lvvm to compile it? -- Steve _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
