On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 07:54:03AM -0700, Jonathan M. Bresler wrote:
> > 
> > Unless I hear unanimous fierce outcry against it, I'm strongly
> > considering making FTP_PASSIVE_MODE obsolete by virtue of being the
> > default for all tools/libraries which currently examine it.
> > FTP_ACTIVE_MODE will be the new flag for toggling the previous
> > behavior.
> > 
> > Given the state of the Internet today, I think this is purely a
> > sensible change in defaults.  Comments?
> > 
>       do any apps check for FTP_ACTIVE_MODE?
>       are we going to apply patches to each app to check for this
>       and maintains those patches over the course of time?
> 
>       seems to be a change without commensurate benefit.....it will
>       confuse some, suprise others and doesnt seem to offer
>       substantial benefit.

It has the (large!) benefit of NATed[1] and firewalled users getting a
working setup at once.  I'm in favour.

[1] Those using natd/ppp -alias will get this already, due to a
protocol translator in libalias.  Alas, this does not combine with
firewalls on the NAT machine unless somebody choose to activate the
code I added to libalias to punch 'holes' in ipfw.

Eivind.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to