On 2000-Feb-21 13:09:21 +1100, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Simply swapping one openssl library for another ... > If we're going to go with that level of packaging granularity >then openssl belongs as a package and should not be part of the >bindist, end of story This sounds awfully like the way the crypt libraries were (and maybe still are) handled: Depending on how you answer the DES question, you wind up with libdescrypt or libscrypt (and a symlink from libcrypt). Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: openssl in -current jack
- Re: openssl in -current David O'Brien
- Re: openssl in -current Kris Kennaway
- Re: openssl in -current David O'Brien
- Re: openssl in -current Will Andrews
- Re: openssl in -current Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: openssl in -current Christian Weisgerber
- Re: openssl in -current Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: openssl in -current Jordan K. Hubbard
- A potential fix [was Re: openss... Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: openssl in -current Peter Jeremy
- Re: openssl in -current Blaz Zupan
- Re: openssl in -current Kai Großjohann
- Re: openssl in -current David O'Brien
- Re: openssl in -current Joel Ray Holveck
- Re: openssl in -current Warner Losh
- Re: openssl in -current Joseph T. Lee
- Re: openssl in -current Kris Kennaway
- Re: openssl in -current Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: openssl in -current Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: openssl in -current Doug Barton