Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Victor Salaman wrote: > > > I personally think that it's braindead to add openssl to the system > > and stripout parts of it (RSA & IDEA). Don't get me wrong, I love to > > have Pardon me for coming late to the party, but what was the rationale behind putting openssl into the source anyway? Given the rsa/no rsa problems, not to mention the US vs. the world problems, what were the benefits that outweighed the complications? Note, I'm not trying to be critical here, I'm just interested in the thought process behind the decision. Doug -- "Welcome to the desert of the real." - Laurence Fishburne as Morpheus, "The Matrix" To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: openssl in -current Peter Jeremy
- Re: openssl in -current Blaz Zupan
- Re: openssl in -current Kai Großjohann
- Re: openssl in -current David O'Brien
- Re: openssl in -current Joel Ray Holveck
- Re: openssl in -current Warner Losh
- Re: openssl in -current Joseph T. Lee
- Re: openssl in -current Kris Kennaway
- Re: openssl in -current Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: openssl in -current Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: openssl in -current Doug Barton
- Re: openssl in -current Kris Kennaway
- Re: openssl in -current Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: openssl in -current Garance A Drosihn
- Re: openssl in -current Kris Kennaway
- Re: openssl in -current Garance A Drosihn
- Re: openssl in -current Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: openssl in -current Doug Barton
- Re: openssl in -current Kris Kennaway
- Re: openssl in -current David O'Brien
- Re: openssl in -current Warner Losh