In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jul ian Elischer writes: [sysctlfs] >Linux have basically done this in their procfs. And have recently started to wonder if that wasn't a mistake I've heard. I would regard sysctlfs as a grave mistake. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree Archie Cobbs
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree Archie Cobbs
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree John Baldwin
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree John Robert LoVerso
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree Julian Elischer
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree Kris Kennaway
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree Garrett Wollman
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree Ollivier Robert
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree Jeroen C. van Gelderen
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree Marcel Moolenaar