Linux have basically done this in their procfs. On Sat, 11 Dec 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > Use a similar hack: map the sysctl tree to the filesystem (ala kernfs) and > > then stat the directory nodes. > > AAIEEEEEE! sysctlfs!! :-) > > It's an interesting idea and I'm not sure why it also horrifies me at > some inner, almost cellular, level. If somebody's actually willing to > do the work of creating such a thing, however, I'll probably get over > it. :) > > - Jordan > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree Archie Cobbs
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree Andrzej Bialecki
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree Archie Cobbs
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree Archie Cobbs
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree John Baldwin
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree John Robert LoVerso
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: Modules and sysctl tr... Julian Elischer
- Re: Modules and sysctl tr... Kris Kennaway
- Re: Modules and sysctl tr... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree Garrett Wollman
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree Ollivier Robert
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree Jeroen C. van Gelderen
- Re: Modules and sysctl tree Marcel Moolenaar