On Wed, Nov 24, 1999 at 09:58:51AM +0200, John Hay wrote: > Well the original line is plain wrong if Brian's patch is being used, > because there message is a pointer and the size of a pointer is 4. Yes, yes, yes. Warner and I are *not* that stupid WRT C. We were both commenting on the *original* proposed patch. Geez. Now rather than try to call us stupid, Kris (and only Kris) could say, "well, I've decided to go with a dynamically allocated buffer, so of course I can't use sizeof() any more". -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Overflow in banner(1) Kris Kennaway
- Re: Overflow in banner(1) Brian Fundakowski Feldman
- Re: Overflow in banner(1) Warner Losh
- Re: Overflow in banner(1) John Hay
- Re: Overflow in banner(1) David O'Brien
- Re: Overflow in banner(1) Kris Kennaway
- Re: Overflow in banner(1) David O'Brien
- Re: Overflow in banner(1) Warner Losh
- Re: Overflow in banner(1) John Hay
- Re: Overflow in banner(1) David O'Brien
- Re: Overflow in banner(1) Dan Moschuk
- Re: Overflow in banner(1) David O'Brien
- Re: Overflow in banner... Dan Moschuk
- Boot error Douglas Kuntz
- Re: Boot error Mike Smith
- Re: Boot error Douglas Kuntz
- Re: Boot error Mike Smith
- Re: Overflow in banner(1) Brian Fundakowski Feldman
- Re: Overflow in banner(1) Kris Kennaway
- Re: Overflow in banner(1) Warner Losh
