Hi Pip:

The perceptual experiments you describe don't seem to me to be necessary.
We already have the moving image of cinema. What I have noticed, however,
is that there is an attraction to the various lab studies. And this will be
of particular interest for "experimental" animation.

One of the things I am a little impatient with is this continual
observation that Delueze is somehow not saying anything about whatever we
want to identify as this "phi phenomenon." It's as if the lab protests the
writer from philosophy. All I have to do is open these first pages of
Deleuze to see that his thinking begins with broader questions than some
sort of film history.

You write that "Deleuze rejects the notion that motion is an illusion
created from stills [. . .]." The very reliance on illusion, as far as I
can tell, has no relevance in what I understand of Deleuze. So, in a sense,
I can agree. But this point doesn't shed any light on what Deleuze thinks.
(I don't think A Thousand Plateaus is a reference.)

No, all these details about tests with lights going on and off reminds me
of Bergson, who is also reading that kind of research, or what we would
today call cognitive science (only it's usually involving people who have
suffered injury of some kind and can thus provide a case study without any
ethical difficulty).

Let's go to this Gary Beydler. I've never heard of him. But the description
lends itself to what goes for "experiment" in film. And that would belong
also to what we encounter in psychological research that subscribes to the
same philosophical orientation. That orientation, if I'm not mistaken, is
rejected by Deleuze. For one thing, it fails to recognize the conception of
movement and time that we find in Bergson. But we're all pretty versed in
these effects, and so (as I see it) we present these as the philosophy of
relevance.

Deleuze isn't easy. But he's damn interesting, and this is in part because
he'll formulate all these notions of images to talk about changes over the
history of narrative cinema (he's selective, and says this history doesn't
include all the screen work we might be paying for).

(And I signed on to open a thought about the avant-garde.)

Bernie






- - - - -
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Reply via email to