Thanks for this Pip. When I was Executive Director for Canyon part of my
function was to visit YouTube and others and asked them to take down films
from their site that work that Canyon distributes.

I once found one of my films on YouTube with a soundtrack by some German
band. I asked YouTube to remove it and I check occasionally to see if any
of my own work is there.

Thanks

Lorie Baillie sent me a photo of Bruce at the mortuary. She had decided to
bury him and Bruce finally looked very much at peace.

Dominic



On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 10:06 PM FrameWorks Admin <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Dear Jaime,
>
> I am interested in copyright law and recently took a course about it.
> Regarding online copyright infringement of experimental filmmakers, I can
> offer this message from Jonas Mekas to Kenneth Goldsmith, the founder of
> Ubuweb, who has been very gracious in removing films when asked by
> filmmakers or their families:
>
> February 27, 2010
> Ken,
> It has come to my attention that you have placed  on your website
> severalthanks of my films, including THE BRIG, ZEFIRO TORNA, LAST THREE
> DAYS OF ALLEN.  You have done this without asking my permission, wich I
> consider irrespectful of me as a person and as author of the works you have
> placed on your website. I have no income, I  am trying to survive, and any
> income that I can get from my work is VITAL to my existence and cotinuation
> of my work.  I think your website is very valuable for  classics of the
> past, works of deceased  film-makers, etc, but I am alive and working, and
> all those works that you have appropriated are available to purchase
> through either myself or Re:Voir or Anthology.
> So  I would appreciate very much if you'd remove all my works from your
> website.
> Thank you,
> Jonas Mekas
>
> Regarding classics of the past and works of deceased filmmakers, copyright
> law gives families and estates ownership and rights for a determined length
> of time.
> This link gives detailed information about how much time:
> https://www.whoishostingthis.com/resources/copyright-guide/#copyright-length
> All work in a fixed or recorded form is automatically protected by
> copyright since the Berne convention of 1988.
> Even transfers of copyright revert back to the author after 35 years, to
> protect authors who bargained away their rights.
>
> Re:Voir actively removes from YouTube any films for which we have a
> contract with the filmmaker or their family and to whom we pay royalties
> for home video sales.
> In addition we have actively fought to pursue copyright protection in the
> case of perceived infringement, for example for Isidore Isou’s daughter
> Catherine Goldstein or for Maya Deren’s heir Tavia Ito.
> Many estates are struggling to preserve and archive the work or in some
> cases to support family members. Therefore I think it is justified to pay
> them royalties that are due.
> Also the filmmakers, families or the distributor have invested heavily to
> make high quality transfers, and they are justified in recovering their
> expenses.
> It is the mission of coops and archives and distributors like Re:Voir to
> make these films available, and these are not rich institutions but
> struggling organizations whose members are mostly underpaid and overworked.
> The families are certainly not rich. Therefore we support legal streaming
> and download and make the effort to remove unauthorized copies.
>
> I hope this helps!
> Pip Chodorov
>
>
>
>
>
> On Apr 19, 2020, at 2:23 AM, jaime cleeland <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> It further promoted a discussion with the Australian filmmaker Peter
> Tammer.  Who then emailed me this.  Please read below and feel free
> to add your opinions.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: *Peter Tammer* <[email protected]>
>
>
> Now here's my argument: one reason these films are being withdrawn from
> YouTube and other sources is that the estates of the artists are claiming
> them as "property", the same way paintings and sculptures gain value in
> monetary terms, whereas novels by great writers of the past and music
> compositions by the great composers, are free to everyone, except where
> performance, recordings and recording rights come into play. In the case of
> classical music, novels, poetry, etc... these great works are not denied to
> lovers of the arts.
>
> But in the visual art world, only the rich, or richly endowed museums, can
> hoard the work and deny access to the greater part of humanity. Including
> us who value the work for its own intrinsic value and not as property to be
> bought and sold.
>
> PT
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Reply via email to