On 14/12/2007, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Laurie Bradshaw wrote: > > Hmm, I'll have to think about that one. How useful would, say, a > > knuckle scan be? > > That would probably be fine, but please try that under windows first so > that you get an idea of the kind of images that come back from your > knuckle. As long as they aren't all-white or all-black (i.e. there is > some substance in the image) it will still be useful. > > Also, at least when sniffing the data, no need to attempt to swipe your > knuckle. Just placing it against the sensor should be fine. I think we > will find that this sensor, like the other swipe sensors we support, > returns continuous "slice"-images (i.e. image resolution of approx > 200x16) with varying overlap - and then the computer has to piece them > together and eliminate overlap. So as long as we can get some of the > slice images from the device, that should be all we need to go on. > > Daniel
The Windows software is very temperamental, so I gave up and scanned the side of my thumb, which seemed to work, created a new bug report with usb log and lsusb output attached _______________________________________________ fprint mailing list [email protected] http://lists.reactivated.net/mailman/listinfo/fprint
