> I see how that could work (specifically, ibag[1] taking > all the remaining data). I can't find anywhere in the spec that makes > it clear that implementations should do this though... What am I > missing?
The wording "residual generators/modulators" I used before is not quite correct. As already ponited out by Marcus, the terminal ibag tells you how many generators and modulators to use. Section 7.7: "The size of the IMOD sub-chunk in bytes will be equal to ten times the terminal instrument’s wModNdx plus ten and the size of the IGEN sub-chunk in bytes will be equal to four times the terminal instrument’s wGenNdx plus four. If the generator or modulator indices are non-monotonic or do not match the size of the respective IGEN or IMOD sub-chunks, the file is structurally defective and should be rejected at load time. " Which in turn means that if (hypothetically) ibag[1] were the terminal zone, the file would be rejected because the size of the igen subchunk wouldn't match that requirement (contrary to what I said before, sry). Tom _______________________________________________ fluid-dev mailing list fluid-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
