On 2019-02-24T13:26:01 +0100 "Tom M." <tom.m...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > I think your confusement may arrise from the question whehter ibag[1] is the > terminal zone or not. This is not quite clear to me.
Sorry, I should have made that clear. In this case neither ibag[0] nor ibag[1] are the terminal zones. The parser I'm writing doesn't expose the terminal zones (or any of the other various terminal records) to the application. > Supposing it is not the terminal, we have the same situation as before: > > ibag[0] has zero generators and zero modulators assigned to it. > ibag[1] takes all the residual generators starting at igen[0] and all > residual > modulators starting at imod[0] (in case any modulators exist at all). Ah, I see! I see how that could work (specifically, ibag[1] taking all the remaining data). I can't find anywhere in the spec that makes it clear that implementations should do this though... What am I missing? -- Mark Raynsford | http://www.io7m.com
pgp5MyjQpagyb.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ fluid-dev mailing list fluid-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
