2018-01-02 15:02 GMT+01:00 Tom M. <tom.m...@googlemail.com>:
> Why do you think it's wrong? According to the MIDI spec
>
> "A Pan Controller [...] determines where a single sound source will be
located in a stereo field."
>
> The "single sound source" is what I understand as "voice", as this is
always a "mono" sound source.
Yes, if you interpret it from a purely technical standpoint and in the
context of our current FluidSynth implementation, then it's technically
correct. But I consider the stereo sample pair as belonging together
(musically, semantically). The fact that the stereo sound source is split
into two separate mono samples which are treated completely independent of
each other and where the panning value is (ab)used to send the audio to the
correct channel is a FluidSynth and SoundFont implementation detail. So in
my opinion, to be true to the MIDI spec, the panning control shouldn't
affect stereo sample pairs at all, as they are not "a single sound source".
Let's say a SoundFont has a drumkit preset with lots of mono samples, all
with different panning positions to give the drumkit some stereo depth.
Those are musical panning positions, and of course the channel panning
control should affect those. But the panning positions -50 and 50 that you
get on a stereo sample pair are *technical* panning positions. They are a
necessary artifact of encoding the stereo sound in two mono samples. They
are required so that the left sample data gets routed to the left channel,
and the right sample data to the right channel. They need to stay fixed,
because the sample data requires them to be like that. If you would change
those panning positions, then the sample data doesn't make (musical and
technical) sense anymore. So the technically and semantically correct
behaviour would be to have those stereo sample pairs be unaffected by the
pan controller, IMHO.
> If the soundfont says that this sample has a default pan to the very
right, applying CC10=0 will pan this voice to the center again. IMO this is
absolutely correct (no matter if this voice was created from a mono or
stereo sample) it's exactly what the user has requested since he used CC10.
Again, from a purely technical standpoint and with knowledge of the
internal workings of FluidSynth and SoundFonts, I agree. But from the
standpoint of the user, I strongly disagree. The user hasn't requested to
output the audio recorded from the right microphone on both channels and
leave the audio recorded from the left microphone untouched on the left
channel. The user has mistakenly requested to pan the apparently single
sound (he only hears one piano string being struck) to the far left (which
can't ever have the intended effect, so we shouldn't do it).
> To achieve the behaviour you described, the user should have used CC8.
(well ok CC8 is not yet implemented, so thanks that you'll take care of
that!)
I agree, the absolutely correct way would be for the user to use CC 8. But
how does he know which preset in his soundfont is stereo and which is mono?
And what if he uses a MIDI keyboard as input that only has a panning
control, but no balance control? I think trying to do the thing that the
user intended by using the pan control would be user-friendly. And reading
the SoundFont specs again, it seems like there is a "linked stereo pair"
information in the SoundFont after all, so maybe we could use that to
detect stereo pairs and react accordingly?
Cheers,
Marcus
_______________________________________________
fluid-dev mailing list
fluid-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
