Hi,

I would also be very interested in a better sounding reverb.

I've written a different reverb as well, implementing a "sympathetic string
reverb" using tuned comb filters. Currently I maintain it in a custom fork,
but I wanted a maintainable solution. So I started working on the LADSPA
plugin system: getting it working properly and in a stable manner,
documenting it and tuning the performance. The largest part of the changes
is already merged in the master branch on GitHub. So adding a different
reverb would be as easy as writing a LADSPA plugin, disabling the internal
reverb and configuring the new one as a plugin. But I guess that won't be
much use for people using FluidSynth on non-Unix platforms...

So maybe what we need is a system where we can have multiple reverb
implementations in core FluidSynth and a setting that can be used to select
one of the implementations.

Cheers,

  Marcus

2017-10-22 19:14 GMT+02:00 Graham Goode <ggoode...@gmail.com>:

> Hi jjc
>
> Yes, there would be great interest in this, particularly from the
> jOrgan users group as many of use us use fluidsynth with the current
> reverb engine.
>
> Kind regards,
> GrahamG
>
> On 10/22/17, Ceresa Jean-Jacques <jean-jacques.cer...@orange.fr> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > For another application than FluidSynth i have build a reverb (intended
> to
> > be called freemverb) that sounds less "ringing" that freeverb.
> >
> > Like freeverb , freemverb is a "late" reverb and have a low cpu load
> > (sligtly above freeverb) and low memory cost.
> >
> > Both freeverb and freemverb aren't high quality reverb, but it seems that
> > freemverb gives better results (at least on my ears).
> >
> >
> >
> > It would be easy to build a version of freemverb for fluidsynth with the
> > same Reverb' API (v 1.0.6 or above if versions above have the same Reverb
> > API than v1.0.6 ?).
> >
> > Before doing that, i wish to know:
> >
> > 1) If there are any interests for FluidSynth ?.
> >
> > 2) Also it is necessary that others peoples than me care objectives tests
> > (by ears) ?.
> >
> >
> >
> > Let me know your opinion.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > jjc
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> fluid-dev mailing list
> fluid-dev@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
>
_______________________________________________
fluid-dev mailing list
fluid-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev

Reply via email to