OK, stop cursing.
Yes, you're right - that should be read as "96 kHz".
BR
Bernd.
Am 05.02.2015 um 13:22 schrieb Mattes:
For heaven´s sake - what for? That´s a dynamic range no human will ever be able
to hear/use?
Or did you just mix up bit-depth and (96khz) sampling rate?
Cheers, Ralf Mattes
_______________________________________________
fluid-dev mailing list
fluid-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
_______________________________________________
fluid-dev mailing list
fluid-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
