On Apr 14, 2011, at 4:25 PM, Sven Meier wrote:
BTW why is it that the resulting shared library is named
"Fluidsynth"? Wouldn't libfluidsynth.dylib be more appropriate?
Sven
Many thanks for your testing earlier.
If you build with the enable-framework option you will build an OS X
framework in which the shared library does not have the .dylib
extension by convention. See
<http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/MacOSX/Conceptual/OSX_Technology_Overview/SystemFrameworks/SystemFrameworks.html
>
If you disable the enable-framework option, then you should get the
*.dylib library.
Regards,
Ebrahim
_______________________________________________
fluid-dev mailing list
fluid-dev@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
