El diumenge, 6 de juliol del 2025, a les 8:02:01 (Hora d’estiu d’Europa central), Zayed Al-Saidi va escriure: > Dear Juraj, > > Thank you to bring this to my attention. It seems the scripty kiddy doing > the fight with my Lokalize and summit without human involvement 😅.
All our translations are forced have the plural form definition of ki18n.po It seems you may be using a different one in falkon than the one in ki18n? Please agree on which is the correct plural form and use the same one everywhere. Cheers, Albert > > في السبت، ٥ يوليو ٢٠٢٥، ١٢:٤٤ م Juraj Oravec <[email protected]> كتب: > > Hello, > > > > For a while I maintain a Falkon project. > > Since the translations are included and synced every day within the git > > repository, I see very often something I call a "translation war". > > > > This "war" consist of changing the SAME translation back and forth over > > and over and over again. Which translator is right? I have no idea, all > > I know is, that it is a mess and it makes a load of useless commits. > > > > The issue is with an Arabic (ar) translation[2] and what seems to be > > numbers. Have a discussion here and now, determine which one is correct, > > correct the translation (if needed) and freeze it. > > > > > "Plural-Forms: nplurals=6; plural=n==0 ? 0 : n==1 ? 1 : n==2 ? 2 : > > n%100>=3 " > > > > > "&& n%100<=10 ? 3 : n%100>=11 && n%100<=99 ? 4 : 5;\n" > > > > vs > > > > > "Plural-Forms: nplurals=6; plural=n==0 ? 0 : n==1 ? 1 : n==2 ? 2 : > > n%100>=3 " > > > > > "&& n%100<=10 ? 3 : n%100>=11 ? 4 : 5;\n" > > In Arabic we using this. See > https://wiki.arabeyes.org/Plural_Forms > > > PS: at the end are links to the commit history[1] for this file and to > > an example commit[2] with this change. > > > > > > Thank you for your help, > > Best regards, > > Juraj > > > > > > [1]: > > https://invent.kde.org/network/falkon/-/commits/master/poqm/ar/falkon_site > > settingsview_qt.po [2]: > > https://invent.kde.org/network/falkon/-/commit/c8dfd002b807c87610fff4a8332 > > 107f4ddccfcc4 > As far I understand, the result both forms will give same result. > Fifth form: for numbers that end with a number between 11 and 99 (like: > 1099, 278) > > n%100>=11 && n%100<=99 ? 4 > n%100>=11 ? 4 > > Is that correct? As I mentioned before, we have sticked to the last one for > decade without issue. > > I don't know who introduced the first one to scripty kiddy. > > Regards, > Zayed
