https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2813
--- Comment #22 from Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Adam Lackorzynski from comment #19) > This change does change anything for me. Also, in libpam's test suite the > pamc structure is placed in static memory, and thus allocating this > dynamically does not make a difference. I initially applied your patch until > I noticed it's not addressing the issue. So, it's curious that your patch makes a difference; string_copy_malloc() just ends up calling malloc() (the libc one) so it should be essentially the same. There has to be something else going on. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
