https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2813
--- Comment #24 from Adam Lackorzynski <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jeremy Harris from comment #23) > Aha. We stash info in the head of the malloc'd block, so our free wrapper > would have to be used. So we have to lose the aforementioned accounting. > I'm *really* disliking PAM now. Oh yes, asymmetric memory allocation/freeing should be avoided. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
