Thanks for your comments.

On 19/06/15 10:53, tokiclover wrote:
> I pretty much like this *light* code of behaviour that gives this
> light hearted feeling while insisting on the kindness and patience!
> rather than a set of rigid rules that absolutely nobody can enforce
> anyway.
>
> Still, anybody should be held accountable for his/her behaviour,
> with high standard for her/his contributions. And this is lacking on
> the current CoB which should have at least a few more practicable
> guidelines for developpers to ensure healthy projects.

Could you please elaborate? We linked to the commit and code guidelines 
(high standard for contributions) and had a few points about behaviour. 
What else, for example, would you include?

>
> Please, do *not* take this in the wrong way. I am only putting it
> this way because when some people feel some power, they can be
> compelled to... abusing it to satisfy some egostical pride or agenda.
>
> Without resorting to a kind of code of conflict[1] a la Linux kernel
> which ricks battle of power and influence with a Techincal Advisory
> Board that would play the Court/Judge.

We currently have raster to be the judge, I think that's fine for now. 
If you strongly disagree, we could maybe consider forming a board, but I 
think that it's unnecessary at this point. Especially since we are a 
relatively (to the Kernel) small community.

>
> A light and practical CoC is far better for a community to ensure that
> conttributors are held to high standard and accountable for/to the
> community. See [2] for some insights on this subject.
>

The developers section also applies to contributors (where possible), 
but also, as importantly, to reviewers who review these contributions, 
so they can steer contributors to the right path.

I hope I didn't misunderstand any of the points raised. I'll read [2] in 
depth soon.

--
Tom.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

Reply via email to