On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 15:27:54 -0400 "Felix S. Boecker"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:

> I run Gentoo Linux on a P4 1.7GHz with 128MB of RAM (my 512 stick just
> gave up) and an nVidia GeForce 5700 LE OC. Because I now have only one
> fourth of the memory I used to have, KDE 3.4 became rather slow and I
> was looking for a new lightweight and fast GUI and Enlightenment had
> come to my attention lately so I decided to give that a shot. e16 being
> the stable release was emerged first and that ran ok but I didn't like
> the UI all that much so I decided to go with the current CVS state of
> e17 which has, for the most part, proven quite satisfactory.
> 
> Except, it's slower than KDE was! I know this is *alpha* stage software,
> but I have read plenty of people's reviews online that said e17 was
> fast. I have Thunderbird on Desktop 1,0 and it takes a good minute and a
> half to be able to see the entire Thunderbird window when switching
> desktops. Opening a new message window to compose this email took almost
> another minute. What gives?

this is weird. what's up? are u running xcompmgr? other processes eating up cpu?
have u checked cpufreq (the cpu freq module) to see if something has downlocked
your cpu? (it wont do anything unless u do it yourself like click on it). are
other processes eating cpu or ram? what is eating all the cpu?

-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
裸好多                              [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本)


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

Reply via email to