Oved Ourfali has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: [WIP] Introduce new directory interface
......................................................................
Patch Set 1: (7 inline comments)
....................................................
File
backend/manager/modules/common/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/core/common/users/DirectoryEntryStatus.java
Line 10: * check performed by the engine.
Line 11: */
Line 12: public enum DirectoryEntryStatus implements Identifiable {
Line 13: INACTIVE(0),
Line 14: ACTIVE(1);
minor thought - I'd use AVAILABLE and UNAVAILABLE (although I know we currently
do use active/inactive).
Line 15:
Line 16: private int value;
Line 17:
Line 18: private static Map<Integer, DirectoryEntryStatus> mappings = new
HashMap<Integer, DirectoryEntryStatus>();
....................................................
File
backend/manager/modules/common/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/core/common/users/Directory.java
Line 26: * @param name the name of the user
Line 27: * @return the user corresponding to the given name or
Line 28: * <code>null</code> if no such user can be found
Line 29: */
Line 30: DirectoryUser findUserByName(String name);
I'd use findUser, with two different overloads.
Line 31:
Line 32: /**
Line 33: * Retrieves an user from the directory given its identifier. Note
that this
Line 34: * identifier is the one assigned by the engine to the user, not
the one
Line 50: * with no particular order, note that the returned set may
contain less
Line 51: * elements than the given set of identifiers and that it may be
in a
Line 52: * different order
Line 53: */
Line 54: Set<DirectoryUser> findUsersById(Set<Guid> ids);
I'd use findUsers
Line 55:
Line 56: /**
Line 57: * Retrieves a group from the directory given its identifier. Note
that this
Line 58: * identifier is the one assigned by the engine to the group, not
the one
Line 63: * @param id the identifier of the group
Line 64: * @return the group corresponding to the given identifier or
Line 65: * <code>null</code> if no such group can be found
Line 66: */
Line 67: DirectoryGroup findGroupById(Guid id);
I'd use findGroup
Line 68:
Line 69: /**
Line 70: * Search the directory looking for users that match the given
search query.
Line 71: *
Line 71: *
Line 72: * @param query the query
Line 73: * @return a list containing the users that match the given query
Line 74: */
Line 75: Set<DirectoryUser> findUsersByQuery(String query);
I'd use findUsers
Line 76:
Line 77: /**
Line 78: * Search the directory looking for groups that match the given
search
Line 79: * query.
Line 72: * @param query the query
Line 73: * @return a list containing the users that match the given query
Line 74: */
Line 75: Set<DirectoryUser> findUsersByQuery(String query);
Line 76:
Just wondering, do you think we also need some query interface?
Line 77: /**
Line 78: * Search the directory looking for groups that match the given
search
Line 79: * query.
Line 80: *
Line 80: *
Line 81: * @param query the query
Line 82: * @return a list containing the groups that match the given query
Line 83: */
Line 84: Set<DirectoryGroup> findGroupsByQuery(String query);
I'd use findGroups
--
To view, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/15596
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/settings
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: If84a0c9d6553d81cdbbe224972696f169cca90d4
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Project: ovirt-engine
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Juan Hernandez <juan.hernan...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alon Bar-Lev <alo...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Oved Ourfali <oourf...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Yair Zaslavsky <yzasl...@redhat.com>
_______________________________________________
Engine-patches mailing list
Engine-patches@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-patches
