Liron Ar has posted comments on this change.

Change subject: core: add the image block alignment scan
......................................................................


Patch Set 6: (5 inline comments)

....................................................
File 
backend/manager/modules/bll/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/core/bll/ScanDiskAlignmentCommand.java
Line 65: 
Line 66:     @Override
Line 67:     protected Map<String, Pair<String, String>> getSharedLocks() {
Line 68:         if (getDisk() != null && !isImageExclusiveLockNeeded()) {
Line 69:             return 
Collections.singletonMap(getDisk().getId().toString(), 
LockMessagesMatchUtil.DISK);
we need to add a message that will be displayed in case that there will be 
attempt to acquire exclusive lock
Line 70:         }
Line 71:         return null;
Line 72:     }
Line 73: 


Line 93:         }
Line 94: 
Line 95:         if (getDiskType() == DiskStorageType.IMAGE) {
Line 96:             if (((DiskImage) getDisk()).getImageStatus() != 
ImageStatus.OK) {
Line 97:                 return 
failCanDoAction(VdcBllMessages.ACTION_TYPE_FAILED_DISKS_LOCKED);
the image can also be illegal for example, can you change the message?
Line 98:             }
Line 99:         }
Line 100: 
Line 101:         if (getVm() == null) {


Line 145: 
Line 146:             parameters = lunParameters;
Line 147:         } else {
Line 148:             throw new VdcBLLException(VdcBllErrors.ENGINE, "Unknown 
DiskStorageType: " +
Line 149:                 getDiskType().toString() + " Disk id: " + 
getDisk().getId().toString());
this is unneeded - please remove it, otherwise we need to put it all over the 
code
Line 150:         }
Line 151: 
Line 152:         Boolean isDiskAligned = (Boolean) runVdsCommand(
Line 153:                 VDSCommandType.ScanDiskAlignment, 
parameters).getReturnValue();


Line 157: 
Line 158:         getBaseDiskDao().update(getDisk());
Line 159:         setSucceeded(true);
Line 160: 
Line 161:         releaseExclusiveDiskLocks();
all of those db operations should be done in the same transaction - otherwise 
in case of engine crash for example, the image will remain locked.
Line 162:     }
Line 163: 
Line 164:     @Override
Line 165:     public List<PermissionSubject> getPermissionCheckSubjects() {


Line 216:     }
Line 217: 
Line 218:     protected Guid getVdsIdInPool() {
Line 219:         if (vdsInPool == null && getStoragePoolId() != null) {
Line 220:             for (VDS vds : getVdsDAO().getAllForStoragePoolAndStatus(
perhaps remove the for loop from here.
Line 221:                         getStoragePoolId(), VDSStatus.Up)) {
Line 222:                 vdsInPool = vds.getId();
Line 223:                 break; // At the moment we select the first VDS in Up 
status
Line 224:             }


--
To view, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/11946
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I4858b7bbfa453230fcafecfbc5358c715d5d825b
Gerrit-PatchSet: 6
Gerrit-Project: ovirt-engine
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Federico Simoncelli <fsimo...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alissa Bonas <abo...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Allon Mureinik <amure...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Erez <de...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Federico Simoncelli <fsimo...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Liron Ar <lara...@redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Maor Lipchuk <mlipc...@redhat.com>
_______________________________________________
Engine-patches mailing list
Engine-patches@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-patches

Reply via email to