On 10/7/23 06:55, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>
> Mark Wielaard <m...@klomp.org> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 12:12:40AM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>>> Currently the newlib, binutils, gdb-patches, elfutils-devel and
>>> libabigail mailinglists rewrite the From header when a message is from
>>> a (strict) dmarc domain. This is to avoid breaking the dmarc policy
>>> and get bounces from such messages.
>>>
>>> However this breaks applying patches posted to the list with git am
>>> since the Author of the patch now looks like it has the mailing-list
>>> email address. This also breaks some tools that use
>>> patchwork.sourceware.org to run CI buildbot jobs (git pw however seems
>>> to get it right, as does using b4 against inbox.sourceware.org).
>>>
>>> glibc and gcc have been experimenting with new mailman settings to not
>>> require From rewriting. Those settings make sure no (essential) Header
>>> are changes, and no changes to the body of the message are made that
>>> could invalidate any dkim signatures. These are the same settings used
>>> by the FSF tech-team for lists.gnu.org. [*]
>>>
>>> At the Cauldron it seemed this was working well and it was pointed out
>>> that some CI bots can get the author of patches wrong for these lists
>>> that use patchwork. Also people seemed to appreciate the change so
>>> they could more easily apply all patches as is from the mailinglist.
>>>
>>> So I am proposing we apply the following settings for these lists:
>>>
>>> - subject_prefix (general): (empty)
>>> - from_is_list (general): No
>>> - anonymous_list (general): No
>>> - first_strip_reply_to (general): No
>>> - reply_goes_to_list (general): Poster
>>> - reply_to_address (general): (empty)
>>> - include_sender_header (general): No
>>> - drop_cc (general): No
>>> - msg_header (nondigest): (empty)
>>> - msg_footer (nondigest): (empty)
>>> - scrub_nondigest (nondigest): No
>>> - dmarc_moderation_action (privacy): Accept
>>> - filter_content (contentfilter): No
>>>
>>> Please let me know if there are any objections or concerns.
>>
>> The above settings are now active for the newlib, binutils,
>> gdb-patches, elfutils-devel and libabigail mailinglists.
>
> Thank you!
>
>>> Also the newlib and gdb-patches mailinglists don't have an admin at
>>> the moment. Could someone volunteer to act as list admin for these?
>>
>> We still need admins/moderators for these two lists.
>
> I'm not a maintainer or anything in GDB nor GNU, but if that isn't a
> prerequisite and if other people are OK with it I'd be happy to be list
> admin for gdb-patches.
>
Would be happy to help with newlib
