Mark Wielaard <m...@klomp.org> writes:
> Hi, > > On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 12:12:40AM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: >> Currently the newlib, binutils, gdb-patches, elfutils-devel and >> libabigail mailinglists rewrite the From header when a message is from >> a (strict) dmarc domain. This is to avoid breaking the dmarc policy >> and get bounces from such messages. >> >> However this breaks applying patches posted to the list with git am >> since the Author of the patch now looks like it has the mailing-list >> email address. This also breaks some tools that use >> patchwork.sourceware.org to run CI buildbot jobs (git pw however seems >> to get it right, as does using b4 against inbox.sourceware.org). >> >> glibc and gcc have been experimenting with new mailman settings to not >> require From rewriting. Those settings make sure no (essential) Header >> are changes, and no changes to the body of the message are made that >> could invalidate any dkim signatures. These are the same settings used >> by the FSF tech-team for lists.gnu.org. [*] >> >> At the Cauldron it seemed this was working well and it was pointed out >> that some CI bots can get the author of patches wrong for these lists >> that use patchwork. Also people seemed to appreciate the change so >> they could more easily apply all patches as is from the mailinglist. >> >> So I am proposing we apply the following settings for these lists: >> >> - subject_prefix (general): (empty) >> - from_is_list (general): No >> - anonymous_list (general): No >> - first_strip_reply_to (general): No >> - reply_goes_to_list (general): Poster >> - reply_to_address (general): (empty) >> - include_sender_header (general): No >> - drop_cc (general): No >> - msg_header (nondigest): (empty) >> - msg_footer (nondigest): (empty) >> - scrub_nondigest (nondigest): No >> - dmarc_moderation_action (privacy): Accept >> - filter_content (contentfilter): No >> >> Please let me know if there are any objections or concerns. > > The above settings are now active for the newlib, binutils, > gdb-patches, elfutils-devel and libabigail mailinglists. Thank you! >> Also the newlib and gdb-patches mailinglists don't have an admin at >> the moment. Could someone volunteer to act as list admin for these? > > We still need admins/moderators for these two lists. I'm not a maintainer or anything in GDB nor GNU, but if that isn't a prerequisite and if other people are OK with it I'd be happy to be list admin for gdb-patches. -- Thiago
