On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 11:01 +0100, Ulf Hermann wrote: > Thanks for pointing out the issues. I will track down the white space problem. > > > I could reconstruct it from that pastebin. But it was a bit of a > > struggle, some parts didn't apply as is because tabs seemed to be turned > > into spaces. I tried to repost it to the list. But the first time it was > > bounced as "spam" and the second time after removing the git-bin-diffs > > sourceware seemed to accept it, but then it never showed up on the list. > > (See below for the logs on my end.) > > I have the same frame pointer unwinding fallbacks for arm and arm64 in > the elfutils bundled with perfparser. I just need to write test cases > for them, then I will post them, too. So, it's probably a good idea to > either have the mailing list accept patches with inline binaries or > allow some other channel of patch submission.
I didn't know about perfparse. I assume that is this code base: http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt-creator/perfparser.git/ Very nice. Please feel free to sent the commit (with git send-email) to me and I can add them to a review branch in elfutils.git so others can review them easily. Or if you already have them in your own git tree feel free to sent the commits to review/pull to the list. And we can pull them from there. I assume this must be the patch that adds the arm64 support: http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt-creator/perfparser.git/commit/3rdparty/elfutils?id=17ad3b57d613fede17a01b6cdd2d894850364f81 I'll ask overseers if something can be done about the sourceware list being a little bit too strict on blocking these emails as spam. Thanks, Mark
