On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 12:28:14 +0200 Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Matthew Mondor > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > At least according to SBCL's documentation string for SOCKET-ACCEPT, it > > also doesn't send the port number as a third value. I'll try to talk > > to SBCL developers about if they want this too, > > Thanks for doing so. If the change is accepted by the SBCL developers then I > will incorporate your patch immediately. So I had a reply from the sbcl-devel mailing list: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=27875090 It appears that SBCL already does it even if its documentation wasn't updated. :) Thanks, -- Matt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got Input? Slashdot Needs You. Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often. Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek. http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey _______________________________________________ Ecls-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
