On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:15:01 -0400 Matthew Mondor <[email protected]> wrote:
> This minor patch adds a third value, the port number. The SBCL > documentation on sb-bsd-sockets:socket-accept also only refers to two > values, but adding a third value should not hurt existing applications, > and seems to be the logical thing to do. I did not check if the actual > SBCL implementation also now does it, but it's possible; it otherwise > would be good to file a bug report for it... At least according to SBCL's documentation string for SOCKET-ACCEPT, it also doesn't send the port number as a third value. I'll try to talk to SBCL developers about if they want this too, afterall ECL's socket layer would only be fully compatible with SBCL's if both did it, even if I think this change would not break old code. Thanks, -- Matt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got Input? Slashdot Needs You. Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often. Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek. http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey _______________________________________________ Ecls-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
