On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Raymond Toy <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think the best answer to your question would be to ask who actually > needs to access characters outside the basic multilingual plane of 16 > bits. If there are none, then 16 bits is fine. If there are some, > then you can decide whether you want to make strings utf-16 or not, or > whether they can live with the 32-bit character type. > That is what I am asking. And again, please allow me to insist, it is not that I am changing the type: it will be a configuration time option. Juanjo -- Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ Ecls-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
