Sorry, meant to reply-all. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: pogo 59 <pogo.w...@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 12:47 PM Subject: Re: [Dwarf-discuss] defaulting to C23 in GCC To: Mark Wielaard <m...@klomp.org>
I think it's reasonable to add codes such as this at least until DWARF v6 is published. It's just a list on a web page, right? Like the language codes. On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 10:59 AM Mark Wielaard via Dwarf-discuss < dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org> wrote: > Hi Jakub, > > On Wed, 2024-11-20 at 16:24 +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Dwarf-discuss > wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 03:09:02PM +0100, Alexandra Petlanova Hajkova > via Dwarf-discuss wrote: > > > GCC15 (to be released in April/May2025) will default to C23 instead of > the > > > C17. > > > There is a new way to describe the language standard version used > proposed > > > for DWARF6 but there is nothing like that for DWARF5 (or earlier). > > > DWARF_LANG_C23 > > > needs to be added to DWARF5. > > > > Why? I think we don't really want to keep adding new DW_LANG_ codes > > to the DWARF 5 set forever. > > The compiler can emit all of > > DW_AT_language DW_LANG_C17 > > DW_AT_language_name DW_LNAME_C > > DW_AT_language_version 202311 > > Note that a new DWARF5 languge code for DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_23 was > added: https://dwarfstd.org/issues/240616.1.html and several others > were added just last month https://dwarfstd.org/languages.html > > But you are right we could just adopt the proposed DWARF6 > DW_AT_language_name/version attributes, which is more flexible. > Question is if we think they are already "stable". > https://dwarfstd.org/languages-v6.html says "The information on this > page is part of the Draft of DWARF Version 6 and is subject to change." > > Cheers, > > Mark > -- > Dwarf-discuss mailing list > Dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org > https://lists.dwarfstd.org/mailman/listinfo/dwarf-discuss >
-- Dwarf-discuss mailing list Dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org https://lists.dwarfstd.org/mailman/listinfo/dwarf-discuss
